Political Cartoon Assignment Essay

The political vignette that I chose mainly aims towards stack who atomic number 18 come to about the environment and people who ar against The American Clean Energy and security system Act. An every day citizen may non get the entire meaning of the blow if they do not know the theme behind it or do not follow politics and environmental news. The toon is political because it clearly states devil things that calculate heavily on the minds of the public in effect(p) now tax and the environment.While this doesnt typically necessarily mean that a cartoon would be political, the word prime on the page in the military mans hand points in the direction of political. The cartoon effectively shows 2 sides of the egression adept where the public is being told that the buck would cause a tax emergence that the American consumers would ultimately have to fight with and another side where the environmentally-conscious person is axiom that its simply a become flat tactic a nd that it would cause more trusty than harm for the country.At first glance, the cartoon was humorous, but the more I looked at it and began to understand what it was talking about, my thoughts began to change. Although its alleviate funny, the cartoon carries a deeper meaning than just entertainment. The main thing that I matt-up was slight irritation that people could call back that there argon only two federal agencys of looking at the neerthelesst and that people could be so relate about taxes that they dont even think about the environment that were living in. Although what is being shown is comical, the emotions behind what the workman is trying to show the viewer is not. eve if he shows that there are two sides of the issue, he still wants you to realize that economists are using the current state of the providence to play on your emotions and try to convert you that youre ultimately hurting yourself by supporting the pen nib. Whether or not the artist was succe ssful in the attempt to stoop the viewer into a way of opinion is up to the interpretation of each single(a) person. For me, it was successful. I was able to externalise the two different sides of the issue and while I understand both, I was able to draw my own conclusion and say that there needs to be some phase of middle ground.In part, the artist wants you to see how youre being manipulated by the economists and the people that are against the bill to believe that the bill will have more of an squeeze on your bank account in terms of more taxes rather than having a good impact on the environment. Although Ive always known that there are people who are against the bill, before eyesight it in cartoon form, I never really realized that they really talent be just a way of making people choose one or the other the environment or your money. In terms of opening my eyes, the artist was successful.