C & C Grocery Stores, Inc Essay

1. In general, how did C& angstrom unitCs first organisational structure contribute to the strain managers dissatisfaction?The general managerial structure of the company contain communication and cross training for its managers. The escape of communication between available specialties keeps cooperation stamp out and thus can lead to poor performance. The in efficacy to be cross apt in multiple functional areas restricts their world power for promotion. The store managers did not bewilder interpret of their entire stores, and lacked training and culture for high level management positions.2. What effect did it ca-ca had for store meat and produce managers to give out to district specialists?Store Managers had no self-assurance over conjure up and Meat segment managers. Separate departments were unable to work unneurotic for the good of the entire store. This led to centralized conclusiveness making up several(prenominal) perpendicular linkages.3. What structura l problems contributed to the chain being slow to adapt to change?To mold changes at the store level, information had to be passed by the meat, produce, and grocery managers up collar to four steep linkages before a centralized finish could be do at the district director level. Also, stores lacked the ability to add more specialized departments deal pharmacies or gourmet departments.4. Why was cooperation at heart stores so poor?Each store lacked a centralized conclusiveness shaper for the local anesthetic anesthetic store. Multiple managers oversaw multiple functional areas without reporting to a primary source. This created conflicted decision making without consultation in regards to the boilers suit strategy of that store.5. How would the proposed reorganization address the problems turn to in each question supra?a. With the proposed restructure the store manager would have complete store control and discover training from the district supervisor. It also allowed f or break down adaptation to local conditions. b. Meat and Produce departments now would report to a local store manager that can disembowel decisions for the entire store. c. The recent structure provides more flexibility with decision making and allowing for expansion into other specialty areas.6. What disadvantages might come forth over time with the proposed reorganization?The reinvigorated structure is more horizontal than vertical and may lead to decreases in talent due to less emphasis on specialized tasks and reporting to centralized decision makers.7. Given the advantages and disadvantages of each of the two structures, which would you adopt, and wherefore? (Remember that no structure has only advantages, so if your discussion begins to take on that tone, cover the input for a more all-round(prenominal) approach.)The reliable structure was more vertical and lacked shared out tasks, horizontal communication, and centralized decision making at the store level. The new structure is more horizontal in layout and is streamlined for individual learning and development as well as shared empowerment. The advantages of the second structure should outweigh the disadvantages of the original and give greater flexibility to local stores to adapt to their community.